verifiedOpen Access Peer-Reviewed Scientific Journal (CC BY 4.0)
Peer-Reviewed Academic JournalInternational Journal of Applied Methods in Electronics and Computers
ISSN: 3023-4409DOI Prefix: 10.58190/ijamec
search
person
Research ArticlesverifiedPeer-ReviewedOpen Access
Pages: 58-64

Performance Comparison of SVM Kernel Functions for Date Fruit Classification

Hüseyin Buldukfingerprint
Kadir Sabancıfingerprint
Publication DateSeptember 30, 2025
Volume / IssueVol. 13, No. 3 (pp. 58-64)
Performance Comparison of SVM Kernel Functions for Date Fruit Classification
Article Figure / Cover

Performance Comparison of SVM Kernel Functions for Date Fruit Classification

Official scientific asset for International Journal of Applied Methods in Electronics and Computers

subject

Abstract

In this study, the Support Vector Machines (SVM) algorithm was employed to classify different types of date fruits. The performances of various SVM kernel functions - namely Linear, Quadratic, Cubic, Medium Gaussian, and Coarse Gaussian- were compared during the classification process. The analyses were conducted using the Date Fruit Dataset, which was published on the Kaggle platform and comprises 34 numerical features. The Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (MRMR) feature selection algorithm was utilized to identify the 13 most effective features for classification. Subsequently, classification was performed using both the complete feature set (34 features) and the selected subset (13 features). The findings revealed that the highest classification accuracy was achieved with the Linear kernel SVM model in both cases. When all features were used, the Linear SVM model reached an accuracy of 91.79%, whereas the accuracy increased to 92.07% when the 13 features selected by MRMR were employed. These results indicate that feature selection plays a significant role in improving classification performance. 

Keywords:ClassificationDate FruitSupport Vector Machines (SVM)Feature SelectionMinimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (MRMR)

Author Affiliations

format_list_numbered

References (22)

Cited Literature
  1. 1

    Das and Rupa (2023). ResNet for Leaf-based Disease Classification in Strawberry Plant. International Journal of Applied Methods in Electronics and Computers 11(03): 151-157, 2023. https://doi.org/10.58190/ijamec.2023.42

  2. 2

    Albarrak K, Gulzar Y, Hamid Y, Mehmood A, Soomro AB. A Deep Learning-Based Model for Date Fruit Classification. Sustainability. 2022; 14(10):6339. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106339

  3. 3

    A. Haidar, Haiwei Dong and N. Mavridis, "Image-based date fruit classification," 2012 IV International Congress on Ultra-Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2012, pp. 357-363, doi: 10.1109/ICUMT.2012.6459693

  4. 4

    Osisanwo, F., Akinsola, J., Awodele, O., Hinmikaiye, J., Olakanmi, O., & Akinjobi, J. (2017). Supervised machine learning algorithms: Classification and comparison. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 48(3), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V48P126

  5. 5

    Lionel J Garcia, Mathilde Timmermans, Francisco J Pozuelos, Elsa Ducrot, Michaël Gillon, Laetitia Delrez, Robert D Wells, Emmanuël Jehin, prose: a python framework for modular astronomical images processing, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 509, Issue 4, February 2022, Pages 4817–4828, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3113

  6. 6

    Muhammad, G. (2015). Date fruits classification using texture descriptors and shape-size features. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 37, 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2014.10.001

  7. 7

    Koklu, M., Kursun, R., Taspinar, Y. S., & Cinar, I. (2021b). Classification of date fruits into genetic varieties using image analysis. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4793293

  8. 8

    H. Altaheri, M. Alsulaiman and G. Muhammad, "Date Fruit Classification for Robotic Harvesting in a Natural Environment Using Deep Learning," in IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 117115-117133, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2936536

  9. 9

    A. A. Abi Sen, N. M. Bahbouh, A. B. Alkhodre, A. M. Aldhawi, F. A. Aldham and M. I. Aljabri, "A Classification Algorithm for Date Fruits," 2020 7th International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), New Delhi, India, 2020, pp. 235-239, doi: 10.23919/INDIACom49435.2020.9083706

  10. 10

    Alsirhani, Amjad, Muhammad Hameed Siddiqi, Ayman Mohamed Mostafa, Mohamed Ezz, and Alshimaa Abdelraof Mahmoud. 2023. "A Novel Classification Model of Date Fruit Dataset Using Deep Transfer Learning" Electronics 12, no. 3: 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030665

  11. 11

    N. Alhadhrami, A. Abobakr, A. Alhammadi and M. Shatnawi, "Multiple Classification of Date Fruit using Transfer Learning," 2023 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2023, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/ASET56582.2023.10180537

  12. 12

    Nasiri, A., Taheri-Garavand, A., & Zhang, Y.-D. (2019). Image-based deep learning automated sorting of date fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 153, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2019.04.003

  13. 13

    M.E. Sonmez, Kadir Sabanci and Nevzat Aydin. Classification of Wheat Rootstock and Their Hybrids According to Color Features by Machine Learning Algorithms. International Journal of Applied Mathematics Electronics and Computers 10(02): 039-048, 2022. https://doi.org/10.18100/ijamec.1098276

  14. 14

    Adige, S., Kurban, R., Durmuş, A. et al. Classification of apple images using support vector machines and deep residual networks. Neural Comput & Applic 35, 12073–12087 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08340-3

  15. 15

    [15] Arshaghi, A., Ashourian, M. & Ghabeli, L. Potato diseases detection and classification using deep learning methods. Multimed Tools Appl 82, 5725–5742 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13390-1

  16. 16

    Gencturk, B., Arsoy, S., Taspinar, Y.S. et al. Detection of hazelnut varieties and development of mobile application with CNN data fusion feature reduction-based models. Eur Food Res Technol 250, 97–110 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-023-04369-9

  17. 17

    Ozaltın, O. (2024). Date fruit classification by using image features based on machine learning algorithms. Research in Agricultural Sciences, 55(1),26-35. https://doi.org/10.5152/AUAF.2024.23171

  18. 18

    Koklu, M. (2021). Date Fruit Dataset. Kaggle. Retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/muratkokludataset/date-fruit-datasets

  19. 19

    Mammone, A., Turchi, M., & Cristianini, N. (2009). Support vector machines. WIREs Computational Statistics, 1(3), 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.49

  20. 20

    Boser, B. E., Guyon, I. M., & Vapnik, V. N. (1992). A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational Learning Theory, 144-152. doi: 10.1145/130385.130401

  21. 21

    Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3), 273–297. doi: 10.1007/%2FBF00994018

  22. 22

    Peng, H., Long, F., & Ding, C. (2005). Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27(8), 1226–1238. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2005.159

format_quote

How to Cite This Article

Bulduk, H., Sabancı, K. (2025). Performance Comparison of SVM Kernel Functions for Date Fruit Classification. International Journal of Applied Methods in Electronics and Computers, 58-64. https://doi.org/10.58190/ijamec.2025.129